APPLICATION
Research plan · Draft
Before generation, it shows the exact account fields, sources, and uses. Only the confirmed snapshot is used to frame the one-sentence question and identify what still needs filling in.
If you choose a lab, the tool checks connections to the professor's public academic material; otherwise it drafts a general research plan. References get format and search-keyword guidance only — never fabricated citations.
Stage one generates 3 title candidates and a 6-part outline for you to edit and confirm — revising structure is far cheaper than revising prose. Only then does stage two write the full text.
It outputs a draft you can copy section by section, plus a personalization map, follow-up questions, and a fact-check list. An explicit handoff can pass the saved run to the review studio.
As you prepare a graduate application, consider whether you have an existing plan, a field of interest, or a professor in mind. Starting from what you already know can help turn your ideas into a research question and a proposal structure.
Research-plan starting pointIf you have a professor in mind, learn about their research and consider where it connects with your question. Bringing the program and professor into view helps you shape a plan for a specific research setting and explain your academic aims in the application.
A proposal begins with a question worth investigating. Consider the phenomenon you have noticed and what you hope to explain; adding the relevant background gives your methods and materials a common purpose and helps you explain the value of the research to a professor.
A research question needs to connect to a workable subject, method, and set of materials. Consider what you can observe, which evidence could answer the question, and what you hope to learn. This framework helps you assess feasibility and discuss the plan with a professor.
AI asks back · choose one item at a time
Once the initial design is in place, check whether the question, method, and available materials support one another. Refining weak links now helps the outline and draft read as a coherent account of how the research can be carried out and why.
Research design summary table
Reading a prospective professor's research can help you consider how your question relates to the lab's direction. Connecting their work with your design gives you a more concrete basis for the proposal and for later correspondence or interviews.
Sources: public knowledge · database facts
The outline turns your question and design into a structure for writing. Check that the title options and chapter points serve the same question, then add evidence and materials to make drafting easier. Adjust the final document to the program's required format before submission.
1 title + 2 alternatives · chapters for your field · questions to address before drafting
A consistent reference style helps readers locate the prior work behind your research question. Choose a format that suits the proposal and check each author, date, and source so the reference list connects clearly to the discussion in the text.
Reference formatAuthor, A. A., & Author, B. B. (2021). Title of the article. Journal Name, 34(2), 110–128. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/yyyyAuthor, A. A. (2019). Title of the book (2nd ed.). Publisher.Author, A. A. (2020, June 3–5). Title of the paper [Paper presentation]. Conference Name, City, Country.Before drafting, consider the target length and any points you especially want to address. Length affects how much space goes to background, methods, and plans; deciding these priorities helps shape a draft that fits your application.
Many applicants turn the research plan into a book report — piling on passion and grand vision, yet never pinning down the research question, never engaging prior work, never offering a feasible method. That emptiness is spotted instantly at outreach, interviews, and faculty review, where it becomes the hardest barrier. A draft that holds up narrows the intent into one concrete question, then grounds it in the professor’s recent research direction.
do not expand until problem, method, and contribution hold.
a plan continues a conversation, it does not open one.
deriving the gap beats counting references.
sources, samples, and two years decide it.
skip generic praise of the university.
length, sections, and references vary.