Paste the company's ES text and it extracts each question's prompt, character limit, and category (gakuchika, motivation, self-PR, research summary, technical project, essay, and so on). Lines it can't classify are listed verbatim — it never guesses on your behalf.
The parse isn't used as-is — you check each prompt, limit, and category line by line, then add the company name and the real touchpoints from info sessions or OB visits. Those notes are the only company facts the motive may use.
Pick your STAR cards and inject your profile and finished self-analysis, then it writes to each question's category formula and character discipline. Facts your material lacks come back as gap questions — never fabricated.
Each answer marks whether the count is met and which card and which axis it used, copyable per question or all at once, with a material-gap and fact-check list — leaving the final polish to your own hand.
Choose the company and role for this application so each answer has a clear audience. Available directory details can be carried in; add what you learned through events, conversations or your own research. Review and copy the draft question by question, then adapt it to the application.
Bring in the company's prompts and character limits, then check each prompt, type and constraint; you can add anything the reader missed. Confirmed prompts shape the focus and length of each draft. The same experience may need a different emphasis for each question, so review the wording before using it.
Prompt text · category · character limit
Choose the experience cards this draft may use so answers stay grounded in actions, roles and outcomes you have confirmed. Selected cards provide the source material; you can add any missing facts. If a suitable card is missing, organize the experience in the library and return to select it.
Add personal details tied to the selected material so your actions, decisions and outcomes are concrete. Answer the follow-ups or leave uncertain points blank; describe any company contact in your own words. These details inform the next design stage and help connect each answer to your experience.
Industry · this company · role · after joining · lead card per prompt
Turn confirmed prompts and material into a question-by-question plan to review before drafting. Check the capability each answer should show, its factual basis and any gaps; edit it or request a revision. Once the direction is clear, generate the answers and review each one.
Motivation thread · per-prompt plan · what to add before drafting
Choose the Japanese writing style and whether saved career-profile facts may add context. The profile supplements this run and does not replace the material cards you selected.
The ES (Entry Sheet) is the first document gate in Japanese job hunting before web tests and interviews. It is not just a resume; it combines self-PR, gakuchika, motivation, career vision, and company-specific prompts in the company's own form. Many applicants turn the ES into a one-size-fits-all template — one experience, swap the company name, fire it at every firm — matching neither the question's formula nor this company's real touchpoints. A draft that holds up reads each question's category and limit, then grounds every answer in your own experience.
similar wording is not permission to reuse.
one asks for action and learning, another for repeatability.
swapping the name is not tailoring.
unbacked answers read as slogans.
remove repetition and adjectives before actions or results.
probing in interview will find them.