Tell the whole story of one effort: the task, your responsibilities and actions, the team's outcome, and what you learned.

The library reservation app course project: the applicant handled backend interfaces and organized integration information; the team made corrections and gave the final presentation.

This question calls for the whole experience, so the background and outcome remain. The actions include operation steps, fields, and error responses so readers can tell what the applicant actually did.

チームの成果のうち、あなたが直接担当した部分はどこですか。

Explanation for readers: Which parts of the team's outcome did you personally handle?

Use the project records to choose one change you made yourself and one task the team completed together. Explain separately who decided, who carried it out, and how the outcome was checked.

Demonstrate a transferable ability through actions and explain how you would use it at work.

Use the rule-checking actions from the course project. The potential application to a role comes from the applicant's interest in technical collaboration.

Question 1 introduces the experience; question 2 answers the strength directly. Shorten the project background and give more space to the checking method and its future use, rather than retelling the entire development process.

相手と意見が異なるとき、どのように認識をそろえますか。

Explanation for readers: When opinions differ, how do you check and align both sides' understanding?

Prepare one real disagreement. First restate the other person's understanding, then explain the basis of each view and what needs joint confirmation. Describe “communication skills” through specific actions.

Answer why you chose this company and why you chose this role.

Course project experience + the public library business introduction for 青凪デジタル + an official role description. Interest in the business and the learning plan are the applicant's own motivations.

Connect personal interest to a concrete business concern, “staff efficiency and user convenience.” Then explain why you want to help turn customer problems into systems. Give separate reasons for choosing the company and the role.

図書館事業のどの点に関心があり、それを仕事としてどう理解していますか。

Explanation for readers: Which aspects of the library business interest you, and how do you turn that interest into an understanding of the work?

Open the company's official business introduction and choose one case. Note the users, operators, previous difficulty, and change brought by the system. Explain the specific approach that appeals to you. Before applying, verify the group entity responsible for the business and the role being recruited.

Explain the difficulty and how you made a judgment when the conditions were unclear.

Use the disagreement over rules and team confirmation from the same course project, focusing on how the problem was handled at the time.

Retain both “what I could correct directly” and “what the team needed to confirm” to show the decision process. Do not turn an ordinary integration difficulty into a major failure or a solo rescue.

自分で修正できることと、チームに確認すべきことをどう分けましたか。

Explanation for readers: How did you distinguish what you could correct yourself from what required team confirmation?

Take one actual rule and explain what had already been agreed, what information was missing, and who had authority to confirm it. If question 1 covers the whole experience, begin this answer with the difficulty and the decision.

Make a career interest concrete through what you want to learn and the work you hope to take on.

The applicant's target role, the strength developed in the course project, and the official role description.

Question 3 explains the choice; question 5 describes a growth path. First learn the business process, development, and validation; then aim to take part in proposals. Avoid unsupported promises framed around years of service or rank.

入社前から始められる準備には、どのようなものがありますか。

Explanation for readers: What preparation could you start before joining?

Write one reservation rule from the course project as “use case—processing rule—exception—check method.” Try explaining it in Japanese to someone who does not write code, and see which parts are still unclear.