This batch of ES
—— 3 companies · 7 prompts
Companies × prompts
Answers
架空企業・株式会社ネクサスデータ
プロダクト企画 · 3 prompts
Describe the experience you invested the most in as a student, including the problem, your actions and the result.
How it is written · interview follow-ups
- What the prompt tests
Show a full chain of cause and effect: locate the problem first, then change something.
- Experience used
Experience card “International exchange sign-up recovery”
Structured analysis
Cross-team facilitation
This experience carries a clear diagnostic sequence and a record that can be checked.
- Why it is written this way
It uses only the confirmed 12 interviews, 84 completions, 61%→87%, and 8→3 minutes, with no invented long-term effect.
The role defines the user problem before deciding what to change.
- Emphasize
- Evidence from 12 interviews
- The candidate's form-redesign responsibility
- Two-week results and handover definitions
- Avoid
- Unrecorded long-term effects
- Team results written as personal results
- Interview follow-ups
- Which adjustment produced the clearest change?
Why do you want to join us, and what would you like to work on after joining?
How it is written · interview follow-ups
- What the prompt tests
Anchor the motivation to a way of working rather than admiration for the industry.
- Experience used
Experience card “Lab data reproducibility scripts”
Data analysis
The reproducibility work maps directly onto the claim about traceable conclusions.
- Why it is written this way
Only publicly stated positioning is quoted; internal practice is not guessed at.
The output of the role is a judgment, and judgments must survive review by others.
- Emphasize
- A process that can be rerun
- Conclusions separated from hypotheses
- Small verification steps
- Avoid
- Speculation about company strategy
- Overstating the role held in the lab
- Interview follow-ups
- How did the team's discussions change after the scripts were in place?
Describe your strength with a concrete experience.
How it is written · interview follow-ups
- What the prompt tests
Use one checkable improvement to show the strength is a method, not a personality trait.
- Experience used
Experience card “Delivery data visualisation project”
Structured analysis
Data analysis
The project leaves a clear before and after and a rule others can re-examine.
- Why it is written this way
Missing data is marked rather than averaged in, so the conclusion is not inflated.
Product planning has to state the boundary when the evidence is incomplete.
- Emphasize
- One shared measure
- Marking the data gaps
- Letting others verify
- Avoid
- Group conclusions written as personal judgments
- Omitting the limits of the data
- Interview follow-ups
- What would you do if the measures could not be aligned?
Before submitting
Facts to check8
架空企業・株式会社ネクサスデータ
—Whole ES
- Check the role title against the current job posting before submitting.
- The lab result stops at reproducing on day one; no unrecorded efficiency figure is added.
架空企業・東都モビリティ株式会社
—Whole ES
- Match the service name and business scope to the current official site.
- Could you add a concrete example of converging disagreement across teams?
架空企業・青葉フィンテック株式会社
—Whole ES
- Base the wording of the product description on the current official site.
- Keep the length and scope of the part-time work consistent with the CV.
- Could you add one concrete example of a risk check?
- The role you want could be narrowed to a specific area of operations.