Ryugaku Jinja · Professor Archive
Public Professor Archive
Toshihiko YOSHIDA吉田 俊彦
Kobe University · University Hospital
- Publications
- 4
- Keywords
- 6
留学
神社Kobe University · University Hospital
Research keywordslaparoscopic liver resection・segment 8 hepatectomy・biliary tract cancer nutrition・venous thromboembolism after hepatectomy・living donor liver transplantation・pancreatic fistula prediction
This is a public-data preview. Personalized fit, contact angles, and saved workflows require sign-in.
- 【肝癌診療2024】肝細胞癌集学的治療の進歩2024 · (株)へるす出版, 2024年09月, 消化器外科, 47(9) (9), 1059 - 1070, 日本語
- ロボット支援下腹会陰式直腸切断術後に8mmポートサイトヘルニアを発症した1例2023 · (株)癌と化学療法社, 2023年02月, 癌と化学療法, 50(2) (2), 221 - 223, 日本語
- Using the comprehensive complication index to assess the impact of Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM)-defined malnutrition on postoperative complications after resection for biliary tract cancer.2018 · PURPOSE: The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria, proposed in 2018, provide universal diagnostic standards for malnutrition, a known risk factor for postoperative complications in patients with various cancers. However, its impact on surgery for biliary tract cancer (BTC) remains unclear. This study evaluates the relationship between GLIM-defined malnutrition and postoperative complications after resection for BTC. METHODS: The subjects of this retrospective study were patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy or major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection for BTC between January, 2013 and December, 2021. The comprehensive complication index (CCI), an indicator of postoperative complications, was calculated based on the total number and severity of postoperative complications. RESULTS: GLIM-defined malnutrition was diagnosed in143 (71.1%) of the total 201 patients. The median CCI was significantly higher in the GLIM-defined malnutrition group than in the non-malnutrition group (37.2 vs. 28.3; P
- Comparison of laparoscopic liver resection for the ventral versus the dorsal areas of segment 8.2018 · PURPOSE: The technical difficulties of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) are greatly associated with the location of liver tumors. Since segment 8 (S8) contains a wide area, the difficulty of LLR for S8 tumors may vary depending on the location within the segment, such as the ventral (S8v) and dorsal (S8d) area, but the difference is unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 30 patients who underwent primary laparoscopic partial liver resection for liver tumors in S8 at Kobe University Hospital between January 2018 and June 2023. RESULTS: Thirteen and 17 patients underwent LLR for S8v and S8d, respectively. The operation time was significantly longer (S8v 203[135-259] vs. S8d 261[186-415] min, P = 0.002) and the amount of blood loss was significantly higher (10[10-150] vs. 10[10-200] mL, P = 0.034) in the S8d group than in the S8v group. No significant differences were observed in postoperative complications or postoperative length of hospital stay. Additionally, intraoperative findings revealed that the rate at which the case performed partial liver mobilization in the S8d group was higher (2[15.4%] vs. 8[47.1%], P = 0.060) and the median parenchymal transection time of the S8d group was longer (102[27-148] vs. 129[37-175] min, P = 0.097) than those in the S8v group, but there were no significant differences. CONCLUSION: The safety of LLR for the S8d was comparable to that of LLR for S8v, although LLR for S8d resulted in longer operative time and more blood loss. THE TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: B230165 (approved at December 26, 2023).
Next stepSign in for fit and contact guidance
Personalized fit, contact angles, and saved workflows require sign-in.