Paste text, upload images or a PDF, or fetch the public URL you enter. The run keeps the source type and any usable URL; it never invents a citation or page number.
The document is organized into application windows, required documents, length rules, language requirements, and selection flow, with a parse-confidence marker on each item. Anything the source does not clearly support is marked for confirmation rather than filled in.
The tool does not read education, home institution, language-score, or target-school profile data. Compare dates, documents, and clauses with the official source, and leave uncertain items explicitly unconfirmed.
The original parse run is private to the current account. A public contribution requires a second confirmation and enters review first. A separate handoff updates an existing application-prep record or creates a new prep record and timeline; it never submits an application, charges a fee, or sends a message.
You get an editable structured checklist. The parse uses only the source and attachments you submit — it does not read your student profile or decide your eligibility. Account data is used only for sign-in, availability and quote checks, and ownership of saved results and timeline entries. The original parse stays private to this account; a public contribution needs another confirmation and human review.
Parse result
One report for eligibility, deadline rules, required documents, writing specifications, and every point the source leaves unresolved.
Confirming that the original parse was saved to this account…
Save your reviewed structured result as a versioned private record for this account. Source bodies, uploads, and local filenames are not copied into it.
The parser never fills in what the text doesn't say. Anything ambiguous is listed here honestly.
Confidence shows parse coverage: high = mostly complete; medium = gaps remain; low = limited source information. Always check the official text.
The synthetic source does not state the research plan's page limit, file-size limit, or submission URL; verify the target graduate school's official guide for that year.
The forms and post-admission steps for international or non-standard academic routes are outside this specimen. The eligibility-review deadline is stated as 17:00 on 21 August 2026 (arrival deadline); do not reuse general-route conditions for an exception route.
This is a synthetic case, not a rule for any real institution. Replace it with the target school's official source before actual use.
If this does not fit, the rest is moot. The university decides; this is only a self-check.
These are source-derived eligibility clauses, not a judgment of the reader's eligibility. Confirm alternatives, cumulative requirements, and exceptions in the original guide.
Listed side by side does not mean all are required. Source guides say either 'meets any one of the following' or 'meets all of them'. Whether these clauses are alternatives or cumulative is not something this page decides — check the wording in the source, and ask the admissions office if unsure.
Dates and subjects are verbatim from the guideline. They change yearly — verify against the official text.
Apply
2026-09-15 17:00
4d leftExam
2026-10-18
in 37dResult
2026-10-30
in 49dDates are normalized to YYYY-MM-DD only when the text pins them down.
| Round | Apply from | Apply by | Deadline type | Exam date | Results | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Autumn intake: online registration and examination-fee payment | 2026-09-01 10:00 | 2026-09-15 17:00 | Not stated [要確認] | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-30 | |
Autumn intake: mailed application documents | Not stated in the source | 2026-09-17 17:00 | 必着 (must arrive)必着 = documents must ARRIVE by the deadline day. Count back the mailing days and send early — confirm against the official guidelines. | Not stated in the source | Not stated in the source |
Exam subjects with scoring/ratio and duration from the source. Subject names and scores are kept verbatim (not translated).
| Subject | Score / ratio | Duration |
|---|---|---|
| 専門科目 | 100点 | 90分 |
| 面接 | — | 20分程度 |
Not stated in this guideline: Notes. We do not infer these, so the columns are omitted.
The list and specs come from the guideline. What is required, and any waiver, is the university's call.
Documents required at application time — check the format and copy-count notes too.
Score validity and submission method are where things go wrong most often — recheck against the source.
Cautions are from the source; the pitfalls block is our general knowledge, not this document's words.
Easily missed warnings — always verify against the source text.
Separate from the original-text parse above, this is general knowledge the platform adds about document pitfalls Chinese undergraduates commonly hit — not facts parsed from the 募集要項 (application guidelines).
The posting date is not the receipt date; international delivery and corrections need lead time.
Your academic route can change the selection category and deadline, so the general route cannot be assumed.
Documents for international selection or eligibility review apply only to some applicants and cannot be added or omitted by default.
This is general preparation guidance, not wording from a school's admissions guide.
Counts back from the application deadline to the latest safe start date for each document. All durations are rough estimates — verify with each institution and the official guidelines.
Auto-filled from the nearest parsed deadline.
必着 = documents must arrive by the deadline. A 7-day mailing buffer is reserved by default (adjustable 3–14). Confirm against the official guidelines.
Aim to have everything ready and mailed by: 2026-09-10
Estimates reflect common cases — always confirm with each institution and the official guidelines. All calculations run locally; nothing is uploaded.
Looking only at the deadline makes it easy to miss word limits, required forms, sealed originals, delivery rules, and eligibility clauses. A safer process separates the document into schedule, documents, format, language, and eligibility, then checks every extraction against the official text. This tool organizes that verification; it does not replace the school's decision or your own eligibility check.
Requirements are updated yearly, and last year's deadlines and required documents often differ from this year's. Always download the current edition from the official admissions page — never parse a prior-year PDF or a reposted copy, or the whole checklist rests on a wrong foundation.
Most graduate schools run several rounds, each with its own application window, exam date, and result date. Remembering one deadline makes it easy to confuse rounds. Capture every round's full schedule so you don't show up to the wrong one.
Transcripts, recommendation letters, the research plan, language scores — some need third-party issuance and take weeks. Listing the full document set first and back-planning each lead time is far safer than finding a gap right at the deadline.
Each school sets its own limits on word count, register (です・ます vs. だ・である), and whether handwriting is required for the statement and research plan. Miss the requirements and even strong content can be cut on form first.
Minimum scores, validity periods, and whether they're mandatory differ across schools for EJU, JLPT, TOEFL/IELTS. Confirm your current scores are still valid and clear the bar — don't discover at application time that you need to retake.
Type of home institution, years of study, residence status, age cap — these eligibility clauses often sit in a corner of the text yet directly decide whether you can apply. Cross-check each against your own background so one line of fine print doesn't shut you out.
