Research fit
Built only from field, question, and methods. Evidence sufficiency is separate and does not enter this score; it is not an admission probability.
Browse the candidates, then compare the professors who interest you. Open each profile to examine research themes, published work, and the points that still need checking.
This run shows 60 professors across 30 universities. It is a decision workbench, not an admission ranking.
Built only from field, question, and methods. Evidence sufficiency is separate and does not enter this score; it is not an admission probability.
A browsing group derived from school tier, role, and public research signals—not graduate-school competition or a safety claim.
A heuristic from G30 availability, Japanese, English, and target tiers. It does not read GPA or verify annual admissions, supervision availability, or document eligibility.
Shows whether public evidence supports the assessment. More evidence does not mean a better professor; verify officially.
Choose the map or a region name to update only the ladder below. Region sets your practical search area; it does not add to research fit.
Showing 60 of 60
The higher-tier slice of your candidates.
Research topic is close (65) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (62) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (61) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (60) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (60) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (59) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (59) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (59) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (59) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (58) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (58) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (57) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (57) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (57) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (57) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (57) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (57) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (56) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (56) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (56) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (56) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (56) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (56) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (55) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (55) · Primary field is this area
The middle slice of your candidates.
Research topic is close (66) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (65) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (63) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (63) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (62) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (62) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (61) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (61) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (60) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (60) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (60) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (60) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (60) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (59) · Primary field is this area
Research topic is close (59) · Primary field is this area
| Field | Hiroshi Ohnuma | Akiko Morozumi | NOBUYUKI DEMISE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Affiliation | 中央大学 | 東京大学 | 明治大学 |
| Research fit | 75 / 100 | 73 / 100 | 74 / 100 |
| Core keywords | 財務報告の質と投資効率 · 会計認識の基礎的構造 | university management · Leadership | business ethics · corporate governance |
| Current judgment | Reach band | Reach band | Match band |
| Main point to verify | The method signal is weaker, so explain an executable research method | The method signal is weaker, so explain an executable research method | The method signal is weaker, so explain an executable research method |